Tuesday, April 15, 2008

UMass students study local climate












SOUTH DEERFIELD- Geoscience students at the University
of Massachusetts at Amherst took their class outside last Wednesday to conduct a hydrology experiment.

Led by Professor David Boutt, the class prepared their experiment in the Crop Research and Education Center in South Deerfield, next to the Connecticut River.

“Today we have been doing a ‘stress test’ where we remove water out of the ground and measure how the system responds,” Boutt explains.

“Whenever you pop a well next to a river, you will be drawing the river flow into the well. It is a nice site because the wells are shallow enough for us to do the experiment well.”

Mark O’Malley, an UMass student majoring in earth systems explained the importance of such experiments.

“If we are taking water out of here to use for drinking or to water the crops, this experiment will let us know how much water we can take out without damaging the surrounding areas.”

In addition, hydrology can also be used to measure climate change.

Timothy Randhir, an associate Professor of Natural Resources Conservation at UMass, has been researching climate change on the Connecticut River.

“Hydrological processes could be used as a mechanism to understand the before and after changes,” Randhir explained. It can allow scientist to document the shifting temperatures from climate change.

Randhir’s research was sparked off by the desire to localise climate change and create better understanding.

“My research attempted to downscale the global predictions. We get a lot of abstract talk about global climate change but it always comes back to ‘how is my water supply going to be affected’ and that is an important question.”

Randhir’s research took global data from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and combined it with his research in order to focus on the Connecticut River fluctuations.

The 2007 IPCC synthesis report says, “warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice and rising global average sea level.”

Global Green house gas emissions (as a result of human activities) have increased by 70% between 1970 and 2004, according to this report.

Using this system, Randhir predicts the Connecticut River is going to see both quantity and quality changes to the water flow.

“The seasonal patterns will change. There will be more winter runoffs and more evaporation and transpiration in summer,” Randhir explained. Runoff is very important because we are dependent on it for water supply and river flow. Rivers and reservoirs rely on it.”

As well as water supply, lack of runoff in summer can lead to pollution concentration and consequently affect aquatic life.

Randhir wants his research to relate better with the general public and in turn, prompt lifestyle change.

“We need to maintain open space and have serious water conservation in the summer months, Randhir suggests. Towns could put pricing restrictions on water as an incentive measure to encourage people to conserve.”

Hydrology is one way to capture the rising and fluctuating temperatures through water measurements.

Randhir research puts climate change into chilling perspective. An increase in temperature by half a degree can now trigger huge shifts in wildlife and water levels.




Photo of: Mark O’Malley (Picture Credit Chris Cuffe)
Video Credit: Chris Cuffe
Audio Credit: Ryan Damon
Article Credit: Pamela Lawn


Thursday, April 10, 2008

Blogger Response #8

This week I am commenting on a Sam Stein blog entitled “McCain Speaker: Have Your Tiger Woods, We’ve Got McCain.” This article was posted on April 8th 2008 and can be found at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/08/mccain-speaker-have-your_n_95665.html.

The main piece of news that this blog talks about are the comments of Former Army Staff Sgt. David Bellavia. Bellavia has sparked a lot of controversy from people from both parties by saying “men like Sen. McCain will be the goal and the men that my two young boys will emulate and admire. You can have your Tiger Woods, we’ve got Sen. McCain.”

Most Americans know that there are many similarities between Barack Obama and Tiger Woods. They are both African American with mixed heritages, they are both well spoken and charismatic, they are both popular and more importantly they are both winners. The democrats are upset because Bellavia is trying to spark more racism in hopes that Obama would lose in November. The republicans are upset because Bellavia referenced Obama to the biggest winner of the past decade: Tiger Woods.

The blog has a video from a shaky cam of the speech in question. I’m sure it was not shot by a professional because the camera shakes around a lot. It is apparent that this is citizen journalism in practice. This video has gotten around the internet and the news world. This piece of citizen journalism has sparked debate from traditional news sources trying to catch up to the story. This video could have been up on somebody’s blog and posted to the web before any traditional news organization had any inkling that something newsworthy was happening. The blog also has a few in-line links to some editorial pieces on the story and a link to an Obama conference call.

The blog does not comment on something that I learned from watching Countdown with Keith Olberman. After this speech McCain embraces his introducer and I’m pretty shocked about that. A few weeks ago McCain took another introducer to task for insulting Obama by making multiple references to Obama’s middle name Hussein. Why did he accept Bellavia’s obvious racist remarks, but not the remarks made by his other introducer? Was it because Bellavia was a former member of the Army? Or does now McCain think Obama is a bigger threat now?

Normally, I don’t focus on the comment board when I am writing this because I rarely see Stein reply to them. There is one line that I thought deserved additional spotlight, and it was from a posted named WLA who said “I think an accurate golf metaphor reply in this case would be, "Yes, we'll keep our Tiger Woods and you can keep your Fuzzy Zoeller." Zoeller is well known in the sports world for being racist and originally didn’t believe Woods had any right playing in the PGA. This is a tremendous comment, and I think it speaks perfectly toward the situation, and the golf metaphor used by Bellavia.

Bellavia before making his Woods comment made a comment with a little bit more weight when he said “There (Congress) will has been replaced by political maneuvering and partisan politics.” This is not new news as it is always the minorities in congress who clamor about bipartisanship. The minority power always thinks the majority should subjugate to their will and not the other way around. No matter what party is in control in congress, the other party whines about bipartisanship. I never complain about bipartisanship because I know the danger of when these people work together. The last time both parties worked together we got the PATRIOT ACT. For the good of the nation, we need partisan politics.